|
|
|
Author |
Topic |
|
AYPforum
351 Posts |
Posted - Jul 08 2005 : 1:05:52 PM
|
1185 From: Mark Dahlby <bluephurba@yahoo.com> Date: Sat Jul 2, 2005 3:49pm Subject: About those pesky para-normal experiences. bluephurba Offline Send Email David wrote, about siddhis or "para-normal" abilities:
> If this is true, that people can do such things, > the world needs to > know.
Hi David,
Actually, the majority of people in the world already believe in these abilities. I think what you meant to say is that you'd like the scientific community to validate the abilitiesfor those of us who don't believe in them or aren't sure.
Most surveys I've seen find that the majority of the population of the U.S. has a personal experience of a "para-normal" event during their lives. The fact that they aren't repeatable and, for the most part, cannot be caused at will, puts these experiences outside of the purview of science. For that matter, science still can't prove that consciousness exists - there is still an ongoing debate in both science and philosophy as to what consciousness is, if animals have it, if it's merely an epiphenomena of material processes, etc. But we don't need science to validate that we're conscious - it's the one thing we all know for sure.
If we expect science to be the final arbiter of truth and reality, we ask too much of it. Science can only deal with what is objectifiable, observable, and repeatable, and a lot of life isn't. That said, there is, I believe, more and more science reporting on "psychic" phenomena. (Sorry about the quotes but really everything we experience is "psychic" so it's a clumsy use of the term but I don't know a better one.)
For the person looking for Benson's work on tummo, it's reported in his popular book "Beyond the Relaxation Response." (hope that's the right title) Also in journal papers though I don't have the urls - should be locatable through a search. The yogis definitely manipulated the temperature in their body - but so what? The real point is what's going on inside the practitioner and that can't be measured.
Last thought to all - how about trimming some of the quoted material off your reply?
Best,
Mark
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 1186 From: "Dave Moore" <riptiz@hotmail.com> Date: Sat Jul 2, 2005 7:06pm Subject: Re: About those pesky para-normal experiences. riptiz Offline Send Email I am currently reading a recommended book from a friend.'The Tao of Physics'.It is written by a scientist/spiritualist and compares eastern philosophy to western science. Seems theres nothing new on this earth that wasn't known for a long time and science is finally catching up on what was beleived by the east for a long time.It's worth a read. L&L dave 1188 From: "david_obsidian1" <david_obsidian1@yahoo.com> Date: Sat Jul 2, 2005 11:35pm Subject: Re: About those pesky para-normal experiences. david_obsidian1 Offline Send Email --- In AYPforum@yahoogroups.com, Mark Dahlby <bluephurba@y...> wrote: > David wrote, about siddhis or "para-normal" abilities:
> > If this is true, that people can do such things, > > the world needs to > > know. > > Hi David, > > Actually, the majority of people in the world already > believe in these abilities. I think what you meant to > say is that you'd like the scientific community to > validate the abilitiesfor those of us who don't > believe in them or aren't sure.
Mark, no, something close but a little more specific (indeed this may be exactly what you mean) --- to establish them as fact to scientific standards, for the scientific establishment itself.
> Most surveys I've seen find that the majority of the > population of the U.S. has a personal experience of a > "para-normal" event during their lives. The fact that > they aren't repeatable and, for the most part, cannot > be caused at will, puts these experiences outside of > the purview of science.
Aha, there you have it! My only truck is with those who claim that they _can_ repeat them and cause them at will --- but don't, and wonder why certain critical thinkers don't believe that they can repeat them and cause them at will. Obviously I have no issues with what you are saying, because you don't even believe them repeatable.
> Last thought to all - how about trimming some of the > quoted material off your reply?
I, for one, am aware of this issue and usually trim quoteback according to judgement, usually using a lot more when in a more complicated interaction where a small amount does not seem enough. Other people's quoteback doesn't generally bother me as I only read what I want of it.
Regards,
-D
|
|
|
Topic |
|
|
|
AYP Public Forum |
© Contributing Authors (opinions and advice belong to the respective authors) |
|
|
|
|